There are many species of humans on the planet today. There is competition between these species of humans for resources such as land to live on, food to eat, water to drink. There is also a fight for survival between the various species of humans to survive each other. Some species of humans are compatible and form alliances. In most cases, the different species of humans prey upon, consume, enslave, exploit and destroy species of humans they are biologically inclined to destroy. Each species of human has a particular nature and a particular function in the ecosystems they inhabit and in the larger global pool of creatures that exist on the planet.
Because of the constant warfare between the various species of humans there is no such thing as a fixed territory or habitat (in modern geopolitical parlance "country") any one particular species occupies. Species of humans are either nomadic or settled depending on their strength to fight off other species of humans to defend their particular mode of existence. Having said this, there are certain zones various species of humans thrive in or find especially suited to their physiology. Some species are most suited for living in tropical climates. Others are more suited to living in temperate climates. Within these climatic zones these species of humans play a role in the circle of life endemic to each zone. Humans are no more exempt from participation in the circle of life than any other living thing on this planet.
Mutations in species of humans that allow them to thrive in vastly different territories or at minimum be indifferent to the environment would have been key for survival against the constant threat of more powerful species of humans that are intent on annihilation them. Many species of humans on the planet today seem to have arrived at this point. Older species of humans that were dependent on the ecosystem in which they existed had to remain in their native biospheres. If they were threatened, they had to either be able to defend themselves or be able to move. Those species that were able to move when they were threatened to new environments were able to survive. This is perhaps the basic reason for the constant moving of populations of species of humans. At this time, most species of humans on the planet can live in diverse range of environments in comparison to older species of humans that were fixed to one habitat. For these species this lack of adapatability meant their ultimate demise when new species emerged that were inimical to their continued survival. Of course the new mutations will have their own limits - for example they cannot live underwater without assistance nor can they live in outer space without assistance. But both of these "frontiers" will eventually be populated if the various human species don't annihilate each other so that no one remains standing.
There are also cognate species that result from planned inter species mating or as a result of forced appropriation of genetic materials through rape and genetic mutations. The offspring of inter species matings are in a difficult position of having to straddle in one body different propensities and requirements of the various species that constitute their lineage. Since each species has its own biological requirements vis a vis food, clothing, shelter, self-maintenance, internal orientation and interpretation frameworks of reality, biosphere, a hybrid of human species faces extra challenges for survival. In most cases, one species will be dominant and the individual will fall into one or another style of existence favored by its progenitor species. The hybrid has to manage all the various voices of the species which go into its makeup. On the other hand, the hybrid is in the unique position of being able to have an interior view of many different species of humans. Of course this sort of internal species management will require an enormous amount of mental "computing" power to keep each species and its requirements distinct.
When a new species is born as a result of genetic mutation, the species in which this new mutation takes birth is unaware of the difference. This new mutation stands in an interesting position. Depending on their biological mandate, they can be of immense assistance to the species in which they have taken birth or they can be the seeds of the ultimate eradication of the species in which they have taken birth. The birth of an enhancement mutation would probably occur as the species is struggling to establish itself. The birth of mutants that will eventually eradicate the species probably occurs when the species is well established. But this does not have to be the case. Positive mutations (that enhance the well-being and development of the species) or negative mutations (that lead to the annihilation of the species) can occur at any time in the life cycle of a species. Regardless of when such a mutation occurs in the life cycle of a species, the occurrence of such development within a species is inevitable.
Morality and ethics in this context is defined by the good of each species. What is moral and ethical is defined by whatever facilitates the existential logic of each species. For example, in inter species interactions where one species preys upon another, the predator species is biologically programmed to engage in open warfare and hostilities or engage in covert operations to access its prey. Most forms of covert attack require the predator species to mimic the prey species modes of existence. The most lethal predators that practice this form of inter species predation are usually mutations in the species that gave it birth. As such they are biologically programmed to be destructive to their birth species.
When this mimicry is done by a foreign species, it can be done in the service of destroying the other species or in the service of forming mutually beneficial alliances. When the prey species is destroyed, harmed, exploited, harvested, the morality that is evident in such an interaction is one of biological imperative. There is no inter species morality established in such an interaction. If the two species cooperate and work toward each other's well being and survival, then there is the possibility of the establishment of an inter species morality.
When predator species practice mimicry as a result only of biological mandate, they do not have transcendence over their biological imperative. Since their biological imperative is to destroy its prey species, the manners and modes of existence of the prey species will be assumed with no interior significance attached to this adoption. Just as a chameleon will adopt the color of the leaf it might find itself on without becoming a leaf, similarly a predator species will adopt the manners and modes of its prey species precisely in order to camouflage itself and thereby gain access to its prey to destroy it. In doing this the predator species is doing what it is biologically mandated to do.
Insofar as all the species of humans are merely acting out their biological imperatives, they are exhibiting and participating in the circle of life which dictates all existence on this planet. All the species of humans obey the dictates of evolutionary pressure. Species of humans survive depending on their fitness to compete in a world governed by biological imperatives. At one time, if the fossil records are to be believed, this planet was covered with an extraordinarily rich and diverse populations of dinosaurs. There were dinosaurs that flew, dinosaurs that could paddle about in water. There were herbivore dinosaurs and carnivore dinosaurs. Dinosaurs lived in all sorts of ecosystems, biospheres. Now they are all extinct and gone. Only a few vestigial species remain on the planet. Human species will also be forced to follow this path of extinction unless each species of man transcends its own particular biological imperative.
